By Alex Smyth
When we were exploring a topic to cover for our latest AMI original documentary, Evening the Odds, the Toronto Bureau team—myself included—all felt that we could tell an important story while still working remotely due to the pandemic.
Once the idea came up about doing a documentary around gender equity in sport, specifically para-sport in Canada, we all quickly agreed it was the story we wanted to do. There were a few discussions surrounding the focus of the documentary and the logistics of telling the story the way we felt it needed to be told, but the topic was never in doubt.
As we continued to research and dig into the topic more, we discovered just how deep—and how big—of a problem it is in Canada and around the world. Make no mistake, there is a huge problem with gender equity in our country in general, and the problems get larger when you dive into intersectionality and disability. So, it was no surprise that sport was in a similar position.
Our biggest challenge when putting the plan together on Evening the Odds was to figure out what areas we would focus on within the overarching story of gender inequity in sport. With only 44 minutes, decisions had to be made to highlight some but not all areas of this topic.
We focused as much as we could on the disability community as it is our focus as a channel, but also because it allows us to get specific within the topic. We knew we wanted to highlight the state of para sports with regards to gender equity, but which ones should we choose? Over the course of researching the topic, we learned there are different models that para sport organizations have used to address gender equity, and each was done for their own reason.
Identifying sports with different models made sense to us, as it gave the audience more insight into how the Canadian para sport system was set up. Wheelchair basketball, para ice hockey and wheelchair curling were chosen as our case studies to examine, and each sport has achieved a different level of gender equity within the sport, based on their model.
For wheelchair basketball, the organization founded two separate programs, one for the men’s team, and one for the women’s team, but ensured that the resources and supports were equal for both systems. The sport has done a lot to push for gender equity in the sport, but both athletes and organizational leaders pointed to key areas in which the sport can do better; namely when it comes to female representation in coaching as well as improving involvement for women and girls at the grassroots level. So, overall, the sport had done some good things, but still has areas to address.
Next, examining women’s para ice hockey, we learned this sport was in a completely different state when it came to gender equity. Instead of having two separate systems, the sport has one at the Paralympic level. While women can compete on the national team, not a single woman has ever rostered for Team Canada. That’s clearly not how you achieve gender equity. As a result, the Canadian Women’s Para Hockey team is trying to grow and develop the game for women so there is a greater opportunity to play, but it remains a long and difficult road to get there. When it comes to gender equity, this sport has a LOT of work to do.
Finally, we come to wheelchair curling, the last para sport case study of Evening the Odds. Where wheelchair curling differentiates from the other two sports is that gender representation is built into the rules of the game. The sport is co-ed and there must always be a woman and a man on the sheet for a team at all times. You may be thinking, "Well this is clearly gender equity, both men and women are required to be on the ice so they are equal, and as a result, the teams must reflect an equal representation," right? Well, that’s only partially right. In talking with Team Canada’s Ina Forrest, we learned that while teams are made up of five athletes, four players and a reserve, many countries only have one woman on the team. So even when the sport requires the teams to have equal representation on the ice, teams still do the bare minimum when it comes to gender equity. Learning that was disappointing.
In examining these three sports, we gained a fairly clear picture as to why this is a problem, and the experts we spoke to reiterated what we had learned. But the problems don’t stop there, as coaching is another big area where there is a stark lack of gender equity. The worst part? It wasn’t always like that and back in the 70s and 80s, typically women’s teams had female coaches. However, as time went on, and the sports grew, men took over the coaching ranks, and women found themselves less and less in positions of leadership.
So, we have sports that are struggling to achieve gender equity within their systems, we have women in few positions of leadership, surely that’s the extent of the problems, right? Not even close. We haven’t even talked about the media when it comes to women’s sport and how it rarely gets broadcast, let alone women’s para sport. There’s also the issue that athletes face when they finish high school, but aren’t at a Paralympic level, where can they play and complete? What about the role men play in helping women achieve gender equity? What about those who don’t identify in the traditional binary system? The list goes on and on.
These were all factors that before working on this project, I had never considered; but now that I have finished this project, it seems to be all that I can think about. And the rest of the Toronto Bureau feel the same way.
I hope you take the time to watch the documentary, Evening the Odds, airing Friday, March 12, at 8 p.m. Eastern on AMI-tv. If more people talk about this issue and become aware of the extent of the problem, then real change can begin to happen.